//Evgeny_Ponomarev, Jun 8, 2020
Web 3.0 vs DWeb
Study Participants & Demographics
The Current Web
3.1 Pain Points
3.2 Web Protocols
The DWeb
4.1 The Meaning of Decentralization
4.2 Values and Mission
4.3 Technical Challenges
4.4 DWeb Tech Usage in the Future
Adoption of the DWeb
5.1 Biggest Obstacles
5.2 The Missing Piece
5.3 The Role of the Blockchain
DWeb Projects Profile
6.1 Categories
6.2 Motivation
6.3 Status and Team
6.4 Technology
6.5 Business

"From: tcmay@netcom.com (Timothy C. May)
Subject: The Crypto Anarchist Manifesto
Date: Sun, 22 Nov 1992 12:11:24 PST
.
Computer technology is on the verge of providing the ability for individuals and groups to communicate and interact with each other in a totally anonymous manner. Two persons may exchange messages, conduct business, and negotiate electronic contracts without ever knowing the True Name, or legal identity, of the other. Interactions over networks will be untraceable, via extensive re- routing of encrypted packets and tamper-proof boxes which implement cryptographic protocols with nearly perfect assurance against any tampering. Reputations will be of central importance, far more important in dealings than even the credit ratings of today. These developments will alter completely the nature of government regulation, the ability to tax and control economic interactions, the ability to keep information secret, and will even alter the nature of trust and reputation.

The technology for this revolution--and it surely will be both a social and economic revolution--has existed in theory for the past decade. The methods are based upon public-key encryption, zero-knowledge interactive proof systems, and various software protocols for interaction, authentication, and verification.

[...]

The State will of course try to slow or halt the spread of this technology, citing national security concerns, use of the technology by drug dealers and tax evaders, and fears of societal disintegration. [...] Many of these concerns will be valid; crypto anarchy will allow national secrets to be trade freely and will allow illicit and stolen materials to be traded. An anonymous computerized market will even make possible abhorrent markets for assassinations and extortion. Various criminal and foreign elements will be active users of CryptoNet . But this will not halt the spread of crypto anarchy."

Via https://nakamotoinstitute.org/authors/timothy-c-may/

L'enfant martyre d'internet ...
À qui on doit des outils dont la veille_RSS / Reddit...
Un sourire, une lutte pour un monde plus libre.

" Adolescent, il participe à la création de deux innovations majeures du Web encore utilisées aujourd'hui : le flux RSS et la licence Creative Commons. Très vite, il est repéré par Tim Berners-Lee, l’inventeur du World Wide Web, qui voit en lui un prodige du net. "
. . .
" Après un passage éclair d'un an à la prestigieuse université californienne de Stanford, Aaron Swartz se greffe, en 2005, à un projet qui va changer sa vie. Le forum d'agrégation d’actualités et de discussion en ligne, baptisé Reddit, rencontre un succès immédiat. La start-up le rend célèbre et est rachetée par Condé Nast. "

Un film ( documentaire en p2p ) retrace son parcours prodige, ses combats, ses luttes ..
https://vidcommons.org/w/9952af68-0b30-4ea0-81ac-a26444541331

Aaron Swartz :
The Guerilla Open Access Manifesto Publié en 2008
https://github.com/greyscalepress/manifestos/blob/9234513c9537cd824da28d53fa937b465dcdd7f9/content/manifestos/2008-07-Guerilla-Open-Access.md
( plusieurs manifetes à l'âge nimérique https://github.com/greyscalepress/manifestos )
“Information is power. But like all power, there are those who want to keep it for themselves. The world’s entire scientific and cultural heritage, published over centuries in books and journals, is increasingly being digitized and locked up by a handful of private corporations. Want to read the papers featuring the most famous results of the sciences? You’ll need to send enormous amounts to publishers like Reed Elsevier. [...]

Those with access to these resources — students, librarians, scientists — you have been given a privilege. You get to feed at this banquet of knowledge while the rest of the world is locked out. But you need not — indeed, morally, you cannot — keep this privilege for yourselves. You have a duty to share it with the world. And you have: trading passwords with colleagues, filling download requests for friends.

Meanwhile, those who have been locked out are not standing idly by. You have been sneaking through holes and climbing over fences, liberating the information locked up by the publishers and sharing them with your friends.

But all of this action goes on in the dark, hidden underground. It’s called stealing or piracy, as if sharing a wealth of knowledge were the moral equivalent of plundering a ship and murdering its crew. But sharing isn’t immoral — it’s a moral imperative. Only those blinded by greed would refuse to let a friend make a copy."

De plus amples informations, détails, contexte :
https://thescienceofdestruction.wordpress.com/2011/08/07/the-guerilla-open-access-manifesto/
https://usbeketrica.com/fr/article/aaron-swartz-martyr-internet-libre

Vidéo Teaser :
https://invidious.fdn.fr/watch?v=I3RLXydbQ00
pdf https://www.pierrepauze.com/_files/ugd/c66e58_493ff61337fc45528da4e18d80f89625.pdf

// Un artiste invente sa propre drogue et mène une expérience scientifique sur des raveurs
"Présentée dans le cadre de l’exposition Futures_of_Love aux Magasins Généraux à Pantin, l’installation vidéo Please_Love_Party de l’artiste @Pierre_Pauze met en scène une soirée techno en forme d’expérimentation scientifique clandestine.
On appelle ça joliment “la mémoire de l’eau”. Apparue en 1988, cette théorie scientifique très contestée a posé comme hypothèse que l’eau pourrait garder en mémoire des informations concernant les substances avec laquelle elle aurait été en contact. Ainsi, dans l’eau, une molécule laisserait une empreinte qu’il serait toujours possible de déceler même après que cette molécule ait statistiquement disparu de l’eau."
...
son #.onion ( #.dead ) http://53liwypofbphxpgh.onion
sur son site : https://www.pierrepauze.com/please-love-party

sur la mémoire de l'eau (autre travail) : https://www.pierrepauze.com/water-memory
. reportage . https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qmodioNL-v0

@Le_Fresnoy ( 2019 )
https://www.lefresnoy.net/fr/Le-Fresnoy/production/2019/installation/1196/please-love-party

Parties
1 Any Browser ( www navigateur_browser )
2 Tor Browser ( dn_tor_onion #.onion )
3 Beaker Browser ( dn_dat )
1 = http://olia.lialina.work/self-portrait
2 = http://bn2lik7torbun6z2.onion
3 = hyper://a81117c7c60d9df7602ad62b265c6f7f034b40b17abbbcd7ab55dbb701fd2e7e/
@Olia_Lialina, 2018

UPDATE 2023

• exposition, supports audio, visite en 3D... @Espace_Mediagantner
  https://www.espacemultimediagantner.cg90.net/fr/exposition/olia-lialina-something-for-everyone/
  https://vimeo.com/466173173

#une présence sur d'autres réseaux, par d'autres protocoles

H3K (Basel) lui attribue un prix ...
https://www.hek.ch/fileadmin/hek_files/Presse/Press_release_net_based.pdf
"Winner of the net based award 2018 : @Olia_Lialina, "Self-Portrait"
With Self-Portrait, Olia Lialina continues her series of “networked” portraits, which explores the relationship between the work and its technological context, highlighting the ever-changing network conditions and our position within this one. After having played with variations in speed of transmission on the web (Summer, 2013 ) and having questioned the consequences of an abandonment of net neutrality (Best Effort Network, 2015 ), Olia Lialina invites us with her latest work to think of the web in its various dimensions, beyond its best-known public face. To contemplate this self-portrait, not less than three web browsers are required: a classic browser ( firefox , Chrome, Safari, etc.), an anonymised and secure browser (Tor) and a “peer-to-peer” browser (Beaker).
By juxtaposing these three windows open onto different parts of the network, we can recompose the fragmented face of the artist whose hair is blowing in the wind with ever so slight discrep-ancies in the movement"